![]() This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.Ĭhoose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways: Get help with access Institutional accessĪccess to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. But the 1980s renewal of the “special relationship” and optimism inspired a reappropriation of traditional themes “to secure D-Day's place in British culture” (p. The British Broadcasting Company had ignored the 1974 ceremonies the Imperial War Museum had produced a somber film ( Overlord, 1975), a now-forgotten relic of 1970s antiwar sentiment. Ronald Reagan's 1984 anniversary speech in Normandy refocused attention on the “celebratory story of national sacrifice for liberty and freedom” repeatedly deployed to stress continuity in America's salvific mission (p. But D-day's meaning also evolved in the aftermath of the Vietnam War and the Falkland Islands conflict. While D-day was marginalized in Canada (with World War I remaining more potent in establishing Canadian identity), Americans and Britons have generally retained a positive D-day narrative that exults in “selfless sacrifice” (p. A huge embroidery symbolically connected Britain with Normandy and 1944 with 1066. ![]() Sam Edwards traces Britain's wistful recollection of “a final demonstration of Imperial unity and of national power” amid a last hurrah for transatlantic equality Britons redeemed their evacuation of the Continent in 1940 at Dunkirk and fulfilled a commitment to France (p. American burials in Europe symbolized Cold War–era commitment. Michael Dolski describes a heroic American narrative in books, movies, monuments, and ceremonies: “a divinely sanctioned quest to liberate the oppressed” (p. ![]() The authors evaluate private and public commemorations in monuments, films, books, and anniversary celebrations to describe and juxtapose common themes of sacrifice, redemption, and liberation with resentment and localized, individualized grief. ![]() Meeting at the transatlantic intersection of comparative and military history and memory studies, this superb book offers incisive analyses of commemoration and memorialization carefully foregrounded by theoretical clarification. 15) amid convergence, their essays trace divergence “according to time, place, and national culture” (p. The authors provide “a comparative examination of how distinct national cultures have memorialized, remembered, and represented” D-day across the decades (p. D-Day in History and Memory brilliantly describes the competing and overlapping narratives that have developed within and among nations directly and tangentially involved in the events of June 6, 1944: the United States, Great Britain, Canada, France, Germany/Austria, and Russia. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |